What is a patent? A United States Patent is essentially a “grant of rights” for a limited period. In layman’s terms, it is acontract in which the United States Of America government expressly permits someone or company to monopolize a certain concept for a limited time. Typically, our government frowns upon any type of monopolization in commerce, because of the belief that monopolization hinders free trade and competition, degrading our economy. A good example is the forced break-up of Bell Telephone some in the past into the many regional phone companies. The us government, in particular the Justice Department (the governmental agency which prosecutes monopoly or “antitrust” violations), thought that Bell Telephone was an unfair monopoly and forced it to relinquish its monopoly powers over the telephone industry.

Why, then, would the us government permit a monopoly by means of a patent? The us government makes an exception to encourage inventors in the future forward using their creations. By doing this, the government actually promotes advancements in technology and science.

To start with, it needs to be clear to you just the way a patent acts as a “monopoly. “A patent permits the homeowner from the Prototype Service Inventhelp to prevent someone else from producing the product or utilizing the process included in the patent. Think about Thomas Edison and his most popular patented invention, the light bulb. Together with his patent for your light bulb, Thomas Edison could prevent some other person or company from producing, using or selling light bulbs without his permission. Essentially, no person could contend with him within the light bulb business, so therefore he possessed a monopoly.

However, in order to obtain his monopoly, Thomas Edison needed to give something in return. He necessary to fully “disclose” his invention to the public. To acquire a United States Of America Patent, an inventor must fully disclose exactly what the invention is, the way it operates, and the easiest way known by the inventor to really make it.It is this disclosure towards the public which entitles the inventor to a monopoly.The logic for carrying this out is the fact that by promising inventors a monopoly in turn for disclosures to the public, inventors will continually attempt to develop technologies and disclose them to the general public. Providing them with the monopoly enables them to profit financially from the invention. Without this “tradeoff,” there could be few incentives to produce technologies, because with no patent monopoly an inventor’s hard work will bring him no financial reward.Fearing that their invention could be stolen whenever they make an effort to commercialize it, the inventor might never tell a soul regarding their invention, and the public would never benefit.

The grant of rights within a patent will last for a restricted period.Utility patents expire two decades when they are filed.If this type of was not the case, and patent monopolies lasted indefinitely, there will be serious consequences. For instance, if Thomas Edison still held an in-force patent for the light bulb, we might probably need to pay about $300 to get a light bulb today.Without competition, there could be little incentive for Edison to enhance upon his light bulb.Instead, once the Edison light bulb patent expired, everyone was able to manufacture light bulbs, and many companies did.The vigorous competition to do just that after expiration in the Inventhelp Prototypes resulted in better quality, lower costing light bulbs.

II. Kinds of patents

There are essentially three types of patents which you should know of — utility patents, design patents, and provisional patent applications. A utility patent applies to inventions that have a “functional” aspect (quite simply, the invention accomplishes a utilitarian result — it actually “does” something).In other words, the thing which can be different or “special” concerning the invention has to be for any functional purpose.To qualify for utility patent protection, an invention should also fall within at least one of the following “statutory categories” as required under 35 USC 101. Stay in mind that just about any physical, functional invention will fall into a minumum of one of these categories, so that you need not be concerned with which category best describes your invention.

A) Machine: consider a “machine” as something which accomplishes an activity due to the interaction of its physical parts, like a can opener, a vehicle engine, a fax machine, etc.This is the combination and interconnection of such physical parts that our company is concerned and which can be protected by the patent.

B) Article of manufacture: “articles of manufacture” ought to be thought of as things which accomplish an activity just like a unit, but minus the interaction of numerous physical parts.While articles of manufacture and machines may appear to be similar in many cases, you can distinguish the two by considering articles of manufacture as increasing numbers of simplistic things which typically have no moving parts. A paper clip, for example is definitely an article of manufacture.It accomplishes a task (holding papers together), but is clearly not really a “machine” because it is a simple device which fails to rely on the interaction of varied parts.

C) Process: a means of accomplishing something through one or more steps, each step interacting somehow with a physical element, is regarded as a “process.” An activity can be a new way of manufacturing a known product or can even be a new use for a known product. Board games are usually protected as being a process.

D) Composition of matter: typically chemical compositions such as pharmaceuticals, mixtures, or compounds such as soap, concrete, paint, plastic, as well as the like can be patented as “compositions of matter.” Food items and recipes tend to be protected in this fashion.

A design patent protects the “ornamental appearance” of the object, rather than its “utility” or function, which can be protected with a utility patent. Quite simply, in the event the invention is a useful object that includes a novel shape or overall appearance, a design patent might give you the appropriate protection. To avoid infringement, a copier would need to create a version that will not look “substantially just like the ordinary observer.”They cannot copy the design and overall appearance without infringing the design patent.

A provisional patent application is actually a step toward obtaining a utility patent, where the invention might not be ready to get yourself a utility patent. Put simply, if it seems as if the invention cannot yet obtain a utility patent, the provisional application may be filed inside the Patent Office to establish the inventor’s priority for the invention.Because the inventor will continue to develop the invention to make further developments which allow a utility patent to get obtained, then this inventor can “convert” the provisional application to a full utility application. This later application is “given credit” for your date when the provisional application was first filed.

A provisional patent has several advantages:

A) Patent Pending Status: By far the most well-known advantage of a Provisional Patent Application is it allows the inventor to right away begin marking the product “patent pending.” This has a period-proven tremendous commercial value, just like the “as seen on TV” label which can be placed on many products. An item bearing these two phrases clearly possesses a commercial marketing advantage right in the first place.

B) Ability to improve the invention: After filing the provisional application, the inventor has twelve months to “convert” the provisional into a “full blown” utility application.During that year, the inventor should try to commercialize the merchandise and assess its potential. If the product appears commercially viable during that year, then your inventor is asked to convert the provisional application right into a utility application.However, unlike a normal utility application which cannot be changed by any means, a provisional application may have additional material included in it to boost it upon its conversion within twelve months.Accordingly, any helpful tips or tips which were obtained through the inventor or his marketing/advertising agents during commercialization in the product can be implemented and guarded during that time.

C) Establishment of a filing date: The provisional patent application offers the inventor with a crucial “filing date.” Quite simply, the date that the provisional is filed becomes the invention’s filing date, even for your later filed/converted utility patent.

III. Requirements for getting a utility patent. Once you are certain your invention is a potential candidate for any utility patent (since it fits within among the statutory classes), you should then move ahead to analyze whether your invention can satisfy two key requirements — “novelty” and “unobviousness.” Both of these requirements are essentially worried about whether your invention is new, and in case so, whether you will find a substantial difference between it and similar products within the related field.

A) Novelty: To have a utility patent, you must initially determine whether your invention is “novel”. Put simply, is your invention new?Have you been the initial person to have looked at it? For instance, if you decide to obtain a patent on the light bulb, it seems like quite clear that you simply would not be entitled to a patent, because the light bulb will not be a brand new invention. The Patent Office, after receiving the application, would reject it dependant on the reality that Edison invented the light bulb a long time ago. In rejecting your patent application, the Patent Office would actually cite the Edison light bulb patent against you as relevant “prior art” (prior art is everything “known” prior to your conception from the invention or everything proven to the public more than one year before you file a patent application for that invention).

For the invention to get novel regarding other inventions on the planet (prior art), it should just be different in a few minimal way. Any trivial physical difference will suffice to render your invention novel more than a similar invention.If you decide to invent a square light bulb, your invention would sometimes be novel when compared to the Edison light bulb (since his was round/elliptical). In the event the patent office were to cite the round Edison light bulb against your square one as prior art to show that your invention had not been novel, they would be incorrect. However, if there exists an invention that is just like yours in each and every way your invention lacks novelty and it is not patentable.

Typically, the novelty requirement is extremely simple to overcome, since any slight variation in good shape, size, blend of elements, etc. will satisfy it. However, even though the invention is novel, it might fail the other requirement mentioned above: “non-obviousness.” So, in the event that your invention overcomes the novelty requirement, do not celebrate yet — it really is harder to fulfill the non-obviousness requirement.

B) Non-obviousness: As mentioned above, the novelty requirement is definitely the easy obstacle to overcome inside the pursuit of Inventhelp Intromark. Indeed, if novelty were the sole requirement to fulfill, then just about anything conceivable may be patented as long as it differed slightly coming from all previously developed conceptions. Accordingly, a much more difficult, complex requirement should be satisfied after the novelty question for you is met. This second requirement is called “non-obviousness.”

The non-obviousness requirement states partly that although an invention as well as the related prior art might not be “identical” (which means the invention is novel with regards to the prior art), the invention may nevertheless be unpatentable in the event the differences between it and also the related prior art would be considered “obvious” to someone having ordinary skill in the field of the actual invention.

This is in actuality the Patent and Trademark Office’s means of subjectively judging the “quality” of your invention. Clearly the PTO has no latitude in judging whether your invention is novel or otherwise — it is almost always quite evident whether any differences exist in between your invention as well as the prior art.On this point there is no room for subjective opinion. Regarding non-obviousness, however, there is quite a bit of room for a number of opinions, because the requirement is inherently subjective: each person, including different Examiners on the Patent Office, could have different opinions regarding if the invention is definitely obvious.

Some common examples of items that usually are not usually considered significant, and thus which can be usually considered “obvious” include: the mere substitution of materials to make something much lighter; changing the dimensions or color; combining items of what type commonly found together; substituting one well-known component for an additional similar component, etc.

IV. What is considered prior art through the Patent Office?

The patent laws, specifically 35 U.S.C. section 102, outline eight major types of prior art which can be used to keep you from acquiring a patent. Quite simply, it defines exactly those ideas which the PTO can cite against you so as to prove that your particular invention is not in fact novel or even to show that your particular invention is obvious. These eight sections can be broken down into an arranged and understandable format composed of two main categories: prior art that is dated before your date of “invention” (thus showing that you are currently not the first inventor); and prior art which dates back just before your “filing date” (thus showing which you might have waited too long to file for any patent).

A) Prior art which dates back just before your date of invention: It would manage to seem sensible that in case prior art exists which dates before your date of invention, you should not be entitled to acquire a patent on that invention since you would not truly become the first inventor. Section 102(a) of the patent law specifically describes the points which can be utilized as prior art should they occur before your date of invention:

1) Public knowledge in the United States: Any evidence that your invention was “known” by others, in america, prior to your date of invention. Even if there is no patent or written documentation showing that the invention was known in america, the PTO may still reject your patent application under section 102(a) as lacking novelty if they can show that your invention was generally known to people before your date of invention.

2) Public use in the usa: Use by others from the invention you are trying to patent in public places in the usa, prior to your date of invention, can be held against your patent application by the PTO. This should make clear sense, since if somebody else was publicly making use of the invention before you even conceived from it, you obviously cannot be the original and first inventor of this, and you do not should get a patent for this.

3) Patented in america or abroad: Any U . S . or foreign patents which issued prior to your date of invention and which disclose your invention will likely be used against your patent application from the PTO. For instance, believe that you invent a lobster de-shelling tool on June 1, 2007.The PTO can use any patents which disclose the same lobster de-shelling tool, U . S . or foreign, which issued before June 1, 2007 (your date of invention) against your patent application.

4) Published publicly in U . S . or abroad: Any U . S . or foreignprinted publications (such as books, newspapers, magazines, trade journals, etc.) which disclose your invention and were published before your date of invention will prevent you from acquiring a patent.Again, the reasoning here is that if your conception was described publicly in a printed publication, then you are certainly not the first inventor (since someone else thought of it before you) and you are not eligible for patent onto it.

B)Prior art which dates back prior to your filing date: As noted above, prior art was defined as everything known just before your conception from the invention or everything proven to the public more than one year before your filing of the patent application. What this means is that in numerous circumstances, even though you were the first one to have conceived/invented something, you will end up unable to acquire a patent on it if this has entered the arena of public knowledge and more than 1 year has gone by between that point and your filing of the patent application. The goal of this rule is always to persuade folks to apply for patents on their inventions at the earliest opportunity or risk losing them forever. Section 102(b) of the patent law defines specifically those kinds of prior art which can be utilized against you as a “one-year bar” the following:

1) Commercial activity in the United States: In the event the invention you want to patent was sold or offered available for sale in the United States more than one year before you file a patent application, then you certainly are “barred” from ever obtaining a patent on your invention.

EXAMPLE: you conceive of the invention on January 1, 2008, and provide it for sale on January 3, 2008, so as to raise some funds to try to get a patent. You need to file your patent application no later than January 3, 2009 (one year through the day you offered it for sale).If you file your patent application on January 4, 2009, for example, the PTO will reject the application as being barred as it was offered on the market more than one year just before your filing date.This also will be the case if someone apart from yourself begins selling your invention. Assume still which you conceived your invention on January 1, 2008, but did not sell or offer it for sale publicly.You just kept it to yourself.Also assume that on February 1, 2008, someone else conceived of the invention and began selling it. This starts your one year clock running!Should you not file a patent on your own invention by February 2, 2009, (1 year from your date one other person began selling it) then you definitely also is going to be forever barred from getting a patent. Note that this provision from the law prevents you from getting a patent, even though there is not any prior art dating back to before your date of conception and you also really are the first inventor (thus satisfying 102(a)), simply because the invention was offered to the public for over twelve months before your filing date because of another person’s sale.Accordingly, “section 102(b) one-year bars” can ruin your chances of obtaining a patent even though you happen to be first inventor and also have satisfied section 102(a).

2) Public use in america: In the event the invention you intend to patent was applied in the usa by you or another several year before your filing of the patent application, then you certainly are “barred” from ever acquiring a patent on the invention. Typical samples of public use are whenever you or another person display and use the invention in a trade show or public gathering, on television, or anywhere else in which the general public has potential access.The general public use will not need to be one that specifically plans to have the public conscious of the invention. Any use which can be potentially accessed by the public will suffice to begin usually the one year clock running (but a secret use will most likely not invoke usually the one-year rule).

3) Printed publication in america or abroad: Any newspaper article, magazine article, trade paper, academic thesis or some other printed publication on your part or by another person, available to the public in america or abroad multiple year before your filing date, will stop you from obtaining a patent on the invention.Note that even a post published by you, about your own invention, will start the one-year clock running.So, for example, in the event you detailed your invention in a press ndefzr and mailed it, this might start the one-year clock running.So too would the main one-year clock start running for you personally when a complete stranger published a printed article about the subject of your invention.

4) Patented in the United States or abroad: When a U . S . or foreign patent covering your invention issued over a year just before your filing date, you will be barred from acquiring a patent. Compare this using the previous section regarding United States Of America and foreign patents which states that, under 102(a) in the patent law, you are prohibited from acquiring a patent when the filing date of another patent is earlier than your date of invention. Under 102(b) which our company is discussing here, you can not get yourself a patent upon an invention which had been disclosed in another patent issued over a year ago, even if your date of invention was before the filing date of the patent.

Inventhelp Ideas – What To Look For..

We are using cookies on our website

Please confirm, if you accept our tracking cookies. You can also decline the tracking, so you can continue to visit our website without any data sent to third party services.